EDAF Process Questionnaire for the Schools: Online PAV

GENERAL

Name *

First

Last

Name of your School *

Date of the online Peer Advisory Visit *

OVERALL SATISFACTION

Please rate the following areas

Any additional comments you would like to share:

EDAF ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

Please rate the following areas

Clarity and completeness of the EDAF assessment criteria *

Very poor	Poor	Average	Good	Very good
Very poorItem #1 Very poor	PoorItem #1 Poor	AverageItem #1 Average	GoodItem #1 Good	Very goodItem #1 Very good

Relevance and applicability to your School *

Very poor	Poor	Average	Good	Very good
Very poorItem #1 Very poor	PoorItem #1 Poor	AverageItem #1 Average	GoodItem #1 Good	Very goodItem #1 Very good

Any additional comments you would like to share:

ADMINISTRATION OF THE OVERALL PROCESS

Please rate the following areas

Design of the administrative process *

Very poor	Poor	Average	Good	Very good
Very poorItem #1 Very poor	PoorItem #1 Poor	AverageItem #1 Average	GoodItem #1 Good	Very goodItem #1 Very good

Clarity of the information and guidance in the EDAF documents *

Very poor	Poor	Average	Good	Very good
Very poorItem #1 Very poor	PoorItem #1 Poor	AverageItem #1 Average	GoodItem #1 Good	Very goodItem #1 Very good

Efficiency of the EDAF staff *

Very poor	Poor	Average	Good	Very good
Very poorItem #1 Very poor	PoorItem #1 Poor	AverageItem #1 Average	GoodItem #1 Good	Very goodItem #1 Very good

Any additional comments you would like to share:

THE SELF-ASSESSMENT PROCESS

Please rate the following areas

Value to the School of the Self-Assessment exercise *

Very poor	Poor	Average	Good	Very good
Very poorItem #1 Very poor	PoorItem #1 Poor	AverageItem #1 Average	GoodItem #1 Good	Very goodItem #1 Very good

Clarity of the guidelines for the Self-Assessment Report *

Very poor	Poor	Average	Good	Very good
Very poorItem #1 Very poor	PoorItem #1 Poor	AverageItem #1 Average	GoodItem #1 Good	Very goodItem #1 Very good

Quality of the guidance from the EDAF staff, if applicable *

Very poor	Poor	Average	Good	Very good
Very poorItem #1 Very poor	PoorItem #1 Poor	AverageItem #1 Average	GoodItem #1 Good	Very goodItem #1 Very good

Any additional comments you would like to share:

THE ONLINE PEER ADVISORY VISIT

Please rate the following areas

Guidance by the EDAF staff in establishing the schedule of meetings *

Very poor	Poor	Average	Good	Very good
Very poorItem #1 Very poor	PoorItem #1 Poor	AverageItem #1 Average	GoodItem #1 Good	Very goodItem #1 Very good

Support from the EDAF staff for the overall organisation of the visit *

Very poor	Poor	Average	Good	Very good
Very poorItem #1 Very poor	PoorItem #1 Poor	AverageItem #1 Average	GoodItem #1 Good	Very goodItem #1 Very good

Management of the visit by the Peer Advisory Team *

Very poor	Poor	Average	Good	Very good
Very poorItem #1 Very poor	PoorItem #1 Poor	AverageItem #1 Average	GoodItem #1 Good	Very goodItem #1 Very good

Balance between courteousness and incisiveness in the interviews *

Very poor	Poor	Average	Good	Very good
Very poorItem #1 Very poor	PoorItem #1 Poor	AverageItem #1 Average	GoodItem #1 Good	Very goodItem #1 Very good

Overall usefulness of the Peer Advisory Visit *

Very poor	Poor	Average	Good	Very good
Very poorItem #1 Very poor	PoorItem #1 Poor	AverageItem #1 Average	GoodItem #1 Good	Very goodItem #1 Very good

Value and quality of the oral feedback *

Very poor	Poor	Average	Good	Very good
Very poorItem #1 Very poor	PoorItem #1 Poor	AverageItem #1 Average	GoodItem #1 Good	Very goodItem #1 Very good

Any additional comments you would like to share:

THE PEER ADVISORY TEAM

Please rate the following areas

Overall quality of the team *

Very poor	Poor	Average	Good	Very good
Very poorItem #1 Very poor	PoorItem #1 Poor	AverageItem #1 Average	GoodItem #1 Good	Very goodItem #1 Very good

Balance between profiles within the team *

Very poor	Poor	Average	Good	Very good
Very poorItem #1 Very poor	PoorItem #1 Poor	AverageItem #1 Average	GoodItem #1 Good	Very goodItem #1 Very good

Quality of the Chairperson *

Very poor	Poor	Average	Good	Very good
Very poorItem #1 Very poor	PoorItem #1 Poor	AverageItem #1 Average	GoodItem #1 Good	Very goodItem #1 Very good

Quality of the designated mentor *

Very poor	Poor	Average	Good	Very good
Very poorItem #1 Very poor	PoorItem #1 Poor	AverageItem #1 Average	GoodItem #1 Good	Very goodItem #1 Very good

Any additional comments you would like to share:

THE ONLINE PROCESS

Please help us improve the oPAV process by answering the following questions

Was it possible to conduct the oPAV with the necessary thoroughness? *

Was the overall duration of the oPAV too long or too short? *

Which session(s) could be shortened? *

Which sessions should be extended? *

Did you experience technical problems? *

Which suggestions for improvement would you like to make? *

Any additional comments you would like to share:

THE PEER ADVISORY REPORT (to be completed once the PAR is finalised and received)

Please rate the following areas

Format of the report *

Very poor	Poor	Average	Good	Very good
Very poorItem #1 Very poor	PoorItem #1 Poor	AverageItem #1 Average	GoodItem #1 Good	Very goodItem #1 Very good

Timely delivery of the Peer Advisory Report *

Very poor	Poor	Average	Good	Very good
Very poorItem #1 Very poor	PoorItem #1 Poor	AverageItem #1 Average	GoodItem #1 Good	Very goodItem #1 Very good

Clarity of the report *

Very poor	Poor	Average	Good	Very good
Very poorItem #1 Very poor	PoorItem #1 Poor	AverageItem #1 Average	GoodItem #1 Good	Very goodItem #1 Very good

Fairness of the report *

Very poor	Poor	Average	Good	Very good
Very poorItem #1 Very poor	PoorItem #1 Poor	AverageItem #1 Average	GoodItem #1 Good	Very goodItem #1 Very good

Value of the report to the School *

Very poor	Poor	Average	Good	Very good
Very poorItem #1 Very poor	PoorItem #1 Poor	AverageItem #1 Average	GoodItem #1 Good	Very goodItem #1 Very good

Any additional comments you would like to share:

SURVEYS

GENERAL

OVERALL SATISFACTION

EDAF ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ADMINISTRATION OF THE OVERALL PROCESS

THE SELF-ASSESSMENT PROCESS

THE ONLINE PEER ADVISORY VISIT

THE PEER ADVISORY TEAM

THE ONLINE PROCESS

THE PEER ADVISORY REPORT (to be completed once the PAR is finalised and received)