EQUIS Accreditation Seminar (April 2024)

The purpose of this evaluation is to ensure that the EQUIS Office continuously improves on the service it offers to schools through the accreditation process. We would like to hear your views of your recent attendance to our seminar.

Name (optional)

First

Last

You are representing a school which *

To what extent did the seminar meet your expectations? *

Completely unmet
Met
Completely met

What is your view of the length of the seminar? *

	Too short	The right length	Too long
Module I - Standards & Criteria	Too shortModule I - Standards & Criteria Too short	The right lengthModule I - Standards & Criteria The right length	Too longModule I - Standards & Criteria Too long
Module II - Datasheet	Too shortModule II - Datasheet Too short	The right lengthModule II - Datasheet The right length	Too longModule II - Datasheet Too long
Module III - SAR	Too shortModule III - SAR Too short	The right lengthModule III - SAR The right length	Too longModule III - SAR Too long
Module IV - Peer Review Visit	Too shortModule IV - Peer Review Visit Too short	The right lengthModule IV - Peer Review Visit The right length	Too longModule IV - Peer Review Visit Too long

How did you find the pace and dynamics of the seminar? *

	Too slow	The right pace	Too fast
Module I - Standards & Criteria	Too slowModule I - Standards & Criteria Too slow	The right paceModule I - Standards & Criteria The right pace	Too fastModule I - Standards & Criteria Too fast
Module II - Datasheet	Too slowModule II - Datasheet Too slow	The right paceModule II - Datasheet The right pace	Too fastModule II - Datasheet Too fast
Module III- SAR	Too slowModule III- SAR Too slow	The right paceModule III- SAR The right pace	Too fastModule III- SAR Too fast
Module III - Peer Review Visit	Too slowModule III - Peer Review Visit Too slow	The right paceModule III - Peer Review Visit The right pace	Too fastModule III - Peer Review Visit Too fast

How detailed did you find the content of the presentations? If you found a module to be insufficiently detailed, please specify which issue you would like to hear more about in the text box at the end of the questionnaire. *

	Not enough detail	The right amount of detail	Too many detail
Module I - Standards & Criteria	Not enough detailModule I - Standards & Criteria Not enough detail	The right amount of detailModule I - Standards & Criteria The right amount of detail	Too many detailModule I - Standards & Criteria Too many detail
Module II - Datasheet	Not enough detailModule II - Datasheet Not enough detail	The right amount of detailModule II - Datasheet The right amount of detail	Too many detailModule II - Datasheet Too many detail
Module III - SAR	Not enough detailModule III - SAR Not enough detail	The right amount of detailModule III - SAR The right amount of detail	Too many detailModule III - SAR Too many detail
Module IV - Peer Review Visit	Not enough detailModule IV - Peer Review Visit Not enough detail	The right amount of detailModule IV - Peer Review Visit The right amount of detail	Too many detailModule IV - Peer Review Visit Too many detail

How did you find the workload given in preparation of each module? *

	Not enough workload	Just enough workload	Too much workload
Module I - Standards & Criteria	Not enough workloadModule I - Standards & Criteria Not enough workload	Just enough workloadModule I - Standards & Criteria Just enough workload	Too much workloadModule I - Standards & Criteria Too much workload
Module II - Datasheet	Not enough workloadModule II - Datasheet Not enough workload	Just enough workloadModule II - Datasheet Just enough workload	Too much workloadModule II - Datasheet Too much workload
Module III - SAR	Not enough workloadModule III - SAR Not enough workload	Just enough workloadModule III - SAR Just enough workload	Too much workloadModule III - SAR Too much workload
Module IV - Peer Review Visit	Not enough workloadModule IV - Peer Review Visit Not enough workload	Just enough workloadModule IV - Peer Review Visit Just enough workload	Too much workloadModule IV - Peer Review Visit Too much workload

How would you evaluate the degree of interaction in each module? Take into account the possibilities of interaction with respect to the given topic. *

	Not enough	Just right	Too much
Module I - Standards & Criteria	Not enoughModule I - Standards & Criteria Not enough	Just rightModule I - Standards & Criteria Just right	Too muchModule I - Standards & Criteria Too much
Module II - Datasheet	Not enoughModule II - Datasheet Not enough	Just rightModule II - Datasheet Just right	Too muchModule II - Datasheet Too much
Module III - SAR	Not enoughModule III - SAR Not enough	Just rightModule III - SAR Just right	Too muchModule III - SAR Too much
Module IV - Peer Review Visit	Not enoughModule IV - Peer Review Visit Not enough	Just rightModule IV - Peer Review Visit Just right	Too muchModule IV - Peer Review Visit Too much

Please rate the following *

	Poor	Fair	Good	Very good	Excellent
Timely reception of materials	PoorTimely reception of materials Poor	FairTimely reception of materials Fair	GoodTimely reception of materials Good	Very goodTimely reception of materials Very good	ExcellentTimely reception of materials Excellent
Support from event coordinator	PoorSupport from event coordinator Poor	FairSupport from event coordinator Fair	GoodSupport from event coordinator Good	Very goodSupport from event coordinator Very good	ExcellentSupport from event coordinator Excellent
Overall event evaluation	PoorOverall event evaluation Poor	FairOverall event evaluation Fair	GoodOverall event evaluation Good	Very goodOverall event evaluation Very good	ExcellentOverall event evaluation Excellent

Do you think your main questions were answered? *

None of my questions were answered
Some of my questions were answered
Most of my questions were answered
All my questions were answered

If you were to register for the seminar again, which form of attendance would you prefer? *

Online
Face-to-face (1.5-day event in Brussels)

Please share additional comments and suggestions for further development of the seminar.

SURVEYS