SURVEYS

MICE.N.E. – coordination meeting in Maribor, 20-21/05/2024

- Step 1 of 6

Overall, I would rate the meeting as

Unsatisfying
Fair
Good
Very good

Please explain why

Organisation of the meeting

Overall, I would rate the organisation of the meeting as

Unsatisfying
Fair
Good
Very good

Please explain why

The objectives of the meeting were clearly defined

No important aspects were missing from the agenda

Which ones?

Content of the meeting

Overall, I would rate the content of the meeting as

Unsatisfying
Fair
Good
Very good

Please explain why

The points of the agenda have been adequately discussed

Please explain why

I understand my role in the project

Please explain why

I understand what is expected from me in the next steps of the project

Please explain why

Cooperation of the consortium

I would rate the way the consortium works as

Unsatisfying
Fair
Good
Very good

Please explain why

I feel fully integrated in the consortium

Please explain why

I feel considered by the project leader

Please explain why

There is a clear sense of common involvement in the project

Please explain why

Impact of the project

I realise the benefits that my institution will get from its participation in the project

Please explain why

These are the aspects I particulary liked or disliked in the meeting

For the next meetings, I suggest improving the following aspects:

Scroll to Top

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “OK”, you consent to the use of all the cookies. Select "No" to refuse third party and non-functional cookies.

You can revoke your consent any time using the Revoke consent button.