Quality Assurance Academy 2021 (fall edition) - EVALUATION

OVERALL SATISFACTION WITH THE PROGRAMME

How did you find the overall programme duration? *

Very poor	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
Very poorItem #1 Very poor	PoorItem #1 Poor	AverageItem #1 Average	GoodItem #1 Good	ExcellentItem #1 Excellent

How did you find the programme structure? *

Very poor	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
Very poorItem #1 Very poor	PoorItem #1 Poor	AverageItem #1 Average	GoodItem #1 Good	ExcellentItem #1 Excellent

Did the advertised time requirements reflect the reality ? *

Would you like to comment further on the time requirements?

Please share 2 highlights from the programme (take-aways) that you learned through your participation: *

PROGRAMME CURRICULUM

How would you rate the overall quality of programme facilitation (the 6 in-class sessions)? *

Very poor	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
Very poorItem #1 Very poor	PoorItem #1 Poor	AverageItem #1 Average	GoodItem #1 Good	ExcellentItem #1 Excellent

Module 1: Empowered Leadership for Quality Assurance (Julie Perrin-Halot) *

Very poor	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
Very poorItem #1 Very poor	PoorItem #1 Poor	AverageItem #1 Average	GoodItem #1 Good	ExcellentItem #1 Excellent

Any comments on module 1 you would like to make:

Module 2: Communicating for Engagement (Kim Watty) *

Very poor	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
Very poorItem #1 Very poor	PoorItem #1 Poor	AverageItem #1 Average	GoodItem #1 Good	ExcellentItem #1 Excellent

Any comments on module 2 you would like to make:

Module 3: Managing Projects Successfully and Managing Successful Projects (Ulrich Hommel) *

Very poor	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
Very poorItem #1 Very poor	PoorItem #1 Poor	AverageItem #1 Average	GoodItem #1 Good	ExcellentItem #1 Excellent

Any comments on module 3 you would like to make:

Module 4: Data as a Competitive Advantage (Benjamin Stévenin) *

Very poor	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
Very poorItem #1 Very poor	PoorItem #1 Poor	AverageItem #1 Average	GoodItem #1 Good	ExcellentItem #1 Excellent

Any comments on module 4 you would like to make:

Module 5: Positioning a Business School for Success (Sarah Vaughan) *

Very poor	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
Very poorItem #1 Very poor	PoorItem #1 Poor	AverageItem #1 Average	GoodItem #1 Good	ExcellentItem #1 Excellent

Any comments on module 5 you would like to make:

Module 6: Leading the Quality Agenda Forward (Amanda Gudmundsson) *

Very poor	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
Very poorItem #1 Very poor	PoorItem #1 Poor	AverageItem #1 Average	GoodItem #1 Good	ExcellentItem #1 Excellent

Any comments on module 6 you would like to make:

Were there any topics that should have been emphasised more? *

Were there any topics that should have been emphasised less? *

Can you think of any new topics that should be covered in the future?

Did you think that preparatory work preceding the block weeks was beneficial and to the point? *

Did you think that assessment tasks were clearly linked to the learning outcomes of the individual modules and as such feasible? *

Did you find the overall time spacing of the programme all right? *

Prep before the block week -> round-table discussion with your fellow mentees -> block week with two modules -> intermediate assessment -> feedback session with your assigned mentor.

MENTORING

Your assigned mentor: *

	Strongly disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly agree
Demonstrated expertise	Strongly disagreeDemonstrated expertise Strongly disagree	DisagreeDemonstrated expertise Disagree	NeutralDemonstrated expertise Neutral	AgreeDemonstrated expertise Agree	Strongly agreeDemonstrated expertise Strongly agree
Created comfortable working environment	Strongly disagreeCreated comfortable working environment Strongly disagree	DisagreeCreated comfortable working environment Disagree	NeutralCreated comfortable working environment Neutral	AgreeCreated comfortable working environment Agree	Strongly agreeCreated comfortable working environment Strongly agree
Was supportive and resourceful	Strongly disagreeWas supportive and resourceful Strongly disagree	DisagreeWas supportive and resourceful Disagree	NeutralWas supportive and resourceful Neutral	AgreeWas supportive and resourceful Agree	Strongly agreeWas supportive and resourceful Strongly agree
Provided quality assistance	Strongly disagreeProvided quality assistance Strongly disagree	DisagreeProvided quality assistance Disagree	NeutralProvided quality assistance Neutral	AgreeProvided quality assistance Agree	Strongly agreeProvided quality assistance Strongly agree
Was available when needed (phone/email/virtual meeting)	Strongly disagreeWas available when needed (phone/email/virtual meeting) Strongly disagree	DisagreeWas available when needed (phone/email/virtual meeting) Disagree	NeutralWas available when needed (phone/email/virtual meeting) Neutral	AgreeWas available when needed (phone/email/virtual meeting) Agree	Strongly agreeWas available when needed (phone/email/virtual meeting) Strongly agree

How would you rate the overall quality of the mentoring you received? *

Very poor	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
Very poorItem #1 Very poor	PoorItem #1 Poor	AverageItem #1 Average	GoodItem #1 Good	ExcellentItem #1 Excellent

To what extent do you feel the mentoring part of the programme met your expectations? *

Not at all	To a small extent	To some extent	To a moderate extent	To a large extent
Not at allItem #1 Not at all	To a small extentItem #1 To a small extent	To some extentItem #1 To some extent	To a moderate extentItem #1 To a moderate extent	To a large extentItem #1 To a large extent

How did you find the alignment of the modules and mentoring? *

Very poor	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
Very poorItem #1 Very poor	PoorItem #1 Poor	AverageItem #1 Average	GoodItem #1 Good	ExcellentItem #1 Excellent

How would you rate the frequency of contact with your mentor? *

Very poor	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
Very poorItem #1 Very poor	PoorItem #1 Poor	AverageItem #1 Average	GoodItem #1 Good	ExcellentItem #1 Excellent

Do you think the interaction and collaboration within your mentee group was a beneficial aspect of the mentoring feature? *

What changes would you suggest to improve the overall quality of the mentoring feature?

PROGRAMME MANAGEMENT & ADMINISTRATION

Please rate your overall satisfaction with the programme management and coordination (EFMD Global/Andrea): *

Very poor	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
Very poorItem #1 Very poor	PoorItem #1 Poor	AverageItem #1 Average	GoodItem #1 Good	ExcellentItem #1 Excellent

Any comments on the programme management & coordination you would like to make:

How did you find the Insendi platform? *

Very poor	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
Very poorItem #1 Very poor	PoorItem #1 Poor	AverageItem #1 Average	GoodItem #1 Good	ExcellentItem #1 Excellent

Any comments on the Insendi platform you would like to make:

Overall, the Quality Assurance Academy is an excellent programme helping me to up-tool my skill set and strengthen my network in the quality assurance community. *

Strongly disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly agree
Strongly disagreeItem #1 Strongly disagree	DisagreeItem #1 Disagree	NeutralItem #1 Neutral	AgreeItem #1 Agree	Strongly agreeItem #1 Strongly agree

Please provide us with a testimonial that we can use when marketing future editions of the QAA (it would help us a lot!):

We would be grateful for a quote from you and even though this survey is supposed to be anonymous, your name or name of your institution will be most appreciated. But even an anonymous quote (if needs be:)) will be appreciated the same way. Thank you in advance.

SURVEYS

Quality Assurance Academy 2021 (fall edition) – EVALUATION