Quality Assurance Academy 2021 (spring edition) - EVALUATION

OVERALL SATISFACTION WITH THE PROGRAMME

How did you find the overall programme duration? *

Very poor	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
Very poorItem #1 Very poor	PoorItem #1 Poor	AverageItem #1 Average	GoodItem #1 Good	ExcellentItem #1 Excellent

How did you find the programme structure? *

Very poor	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
Very poorItem #1 Very poor	PoorItem #1 Poor	AverageItem #1 Average	GoodItem #1 Good	ExcellentItem #1 Excellent

Did the advertised time requirements reflected the reality ? *

Would you like to comment further on the time requirements?

Please share 2 highlights from the programme (take-aways) that you learned through your participation: *

PROGRAMME CURRICULUM

Leadership I: Empowered Leadership for Quality Assurance (Julie Perrin-Halot) *

Very poor	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
Very poorItem #1 Very poor	PoorItem #1 Poor	AverageItem #1 Average	GoodItem #1 Good	ExcellentItem #1 Excellent

Any comments on the Leadership I module you would like to make:

Analysis & Communication I: Your QA/M Role as a Pathway for Professional Success: Your Career, Your Journey (Kim Watty) *

Very poor	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
Very poorItem #1 Very poor	PoorItem #1 Poor	AverageItem #1 Average	GoodItem #1 Good	ExcellentItem #1 Excellent

Any comments on the Analysis & Communication I module you would like to make:

Information Management: “Sapere Aude” (Dare to Know): Data as a Competitive Advantage (Benjamin Stévenin) *

Very poor	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
Very poorItem #1 Very poor	PoorItem #1 Poor	AverageItem #1 Average	GoodItem #1 Good	ExcellentItem #1 Excellent

Any comments on the Information Management module you would like to make:

Project Management: Mastering the Double Hurdle: Managing Projects Successfully and Managing Successful Projects! (Ulrich Hommel) *

Very poor	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
Very poorItem #1 Very poor	PoorItem #1 Poor	AverageItem #1 Average	GoodItem #1 Good	ExcellentItem #1 Excellent

Any comments on the Project Management module you would like to make:

Analysis & Communication II: Positioning a Business School for Success: Structuring your School’s Accreditation Story (Sarah Vaughan) *

Very poor	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
Very poorItem #1 Very poor	PoorItem #1 Poor	AverageItem #1 Average	GoodItem #1 Good	ExcellentItem #1 Excellent

Any comments on the Analysis & Communication II module you would like to make:

Leadership II: Seeing What Is Next and Acting on It: Lead the Quality Agenda Forward (Amanda Gudmundsson) *

Very poor	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
Very poorItem #1 Very poor	PoorItem #1 Poor	AverageItem #1 Average	GoodItem #1 Good	ExcellentItem #1 Excellent

Any comments on the Leadership II module you would like to make:

Were there any topics that should have been emphasised more? *

Were there any topics that should have been emphasised less? *

Can you think of any new topics that should be covered in the future?

Did you think that preparatory work prior to the individual modules was beneficial and to the point? *

Did you think that assessment tasks were clearly linked to the learning outcomes of the individual modules and as such feasible? *

Did you find the overall time spacing of the programme all right? *

Week for preparatory work -> round-table discussion with your fellow mentees -> block week with two modules -> week for assessment task -> feedback session with your assigned mentor.

MENTORING

Your assigned mentor: *

	Strongly disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly agree
Demonstrated expertise	Strongly disagreeDemonstrated expertise Strongly disagree	DisagreeDemonstrated expertise Disagree	NeutralDemonstrated expertise Neutral	AgreeDemonstrated expertise Agree	Strongly agreeDemonstrated expertise Strongly agree
Created comfortable working environment	Strongly disagreeCreated comfortable working environment Strongly disagree	DisagreeCreated comfortable working environment Disagree	NeutralCreated comfortable working environment Neutral	AgreeCreated comfortable working environment Agree	Strongly agreeCreated comfortable working environment Strongly agree
Was supportive and resourceful	Strongly disagreeWas supportive and resourceful Strongly disagree	DisagreeWas supportive and resourceful Disagree	NeutralWas supportive and resourceful Neutral	AgreeWas supportive and resourceful Agree	Strongly agreeWas supportive and resourceful Strongly agree
Provided quality assistance	Strongly disagreeProvided quality assistance Strongly disagree	DisagreeProvided quality assistance Disagree	NeutralProvided quality assistance Neutral	AgreeProvided quality assistance Agree	Strongly agreeProvided quality assistance Strongly agree
Was available when needed (phone/email/virtual meeting)	Strongly disagreeWas available when needed (phone/email/virtual meeting) Strongly disagree	DisagreeWas available when needed (phone/email/virtual meeting) Disagree	NeutralWas available when needed (phone/email/virtual meeting) Neutral	AgreeWas available when needed (phone/email/virtual meeting) Agree	Strongly agreeWas available when needed (phone/email/virtual meeting) Strongly agree

How would you rate the overall quality of the mentoring you received? *

Very poor	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
Very poorItem #1 Very poor	PoorItem #1 Poor	AverageItem #1 Average	GoodItem #1 Good	ExcellentItem #1 Excellent

To what extent do you feel the mentoring part of the programme met your expectations? *

Not at all	To a small extent	To some extent	To a moderate extent	To a large extent
Not at allItem #1 Not at all	To a small extentItem #1 To a small extent	To some extentItem #1 To some extent	To a moderate extentItem #1 To a moderate extent	To a large extentItem #1 To a large extent

How did you find the alignment of the modules and mentoring? *

Very poor	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
Very poorItem #1 Very poor	PoorItem #1 Poor	AverageItem #1 Average	GoodItem #1 Good	ExcellentItem #1 Excellent

How would you rate the frequency of contact with your mentor? *

Very poor	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
Very poorItem #1 Very poor	PoorItem #1 Poor	AverageItem #1 Average	GoodItem #1 Good	ExcellentItem #1 Excellent

Do you think the interaction and collaboration within your mentee group was a beneficial aspect of the mentoring feature? *

Would you like to maintain contact with your mentor in the future? *

What changes would you suggest to improve the overall quality of the mentoring feature?

Would you like to share any additional comments?

PROGRAMME MANAGEMENT & ADMINISTRATION

Please rate your overall satisfaction with the programme management and coordination (EFMD Global/Andrea): *

Very poor	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
Very poorItem #1 Very poor	PoorItem #1 Poor	AverageItem #1 Average	GoodItem #1 Good	ExcellentItem #1 Excellent

Any comments on the programme management & administration you would like to make:

How did you find the insendi platform? *

Very poor	Poor	Average	Good	Excellent
Very poorItem #1 Very poor	PoorItem #1 Poor	AverageItem #1 Average	GoodItem #1 Good	ExcellentItem #1 Excellent

Any comments on the insendi platform you would like to make:

Please provide suggestion(s) for improvement for the next edition:

Please share any additional comments you might have:

SURVEYS

Quality Assurance Academy 2021 (spring edition) – EVALUATION