SQUARE - management meeting on 7 July 2021 in Batumi, Georgia

ORGANISATION

I would rate the organisation of the meeting as

Unsatisfying	Fair	Good	Very good
UnsatisfyingCompany Overall Unsatisfying	FairCompany Overall Fair	GoodCompany Overall Good	Very goodCompany Overall Very good

I received the agenda in advance

Yes	No
YesItem #1 Yes	NoItem #1 No

The objectives of the meeting were clearly defined

Yes	No
YesItem #1 Yes	NoItem #1 No

INFORMATION

I would rate the information I received for this meeting as

Unsatisfying	Fair	Good	Very good
UnsatisfyingCompany Overall Unsatisfying	FairCompany Overall Fair	GoodCompany Overall Good	Very goodCompany Overall Very good

I consult materials (minutes, presentations and reports) and the agenda on the website

Yes	No
YesItem #1 Yes	NoItem #1 No

I would rate the hybrid form of the meeting as

Unsatisfying	Fair	Good	Very good
UnsatisfyingItem #1 Unsatisfying	FairItem #1 Fair	GoodItem #1 Good	Very goodItem #1 Very good

For the next meetings (2nd semester, 2021), I consider participating online rather than face-to-face

Yes	No
YesItem #1 Yes	NoItem #1 No

CONTENT

I would rate the content of the meeting as

Unsatisfying	Fair	Good	Very good
UnsatisfyingCompany Overall Unsatisfying	FairCompany Overall Fair	GoodCompany Overall Good	Very goodCompany Overall Very good

The goals of the project have been clearly presented

Yes	No
YesItem #1 Yes	NoItem #1 No

The activities have been clearly explained

Yes	No
YesItem #1 Yes	NoItem #1 No

I understand my role in the project

Yes	No
YesItem #1 Yes	NoItem #1 No

I understand what is expected from me in the next steps of the project

Yes	No
YesItem #1 Yes	NoItem #1 No

The duration of the meeting was adequate to cover all points and answer to the questions I had

Yes	No
YesItem #1 Yes	NoItem #1 No

Overall, I would rate the meeting as:

Unsatisfying	Fair	Good	Very good
UnsatisfyingCompany Overall Unsatisfying	FairCompany Overall Fair	GoodCompany Overall Good	Very goodCompany Overall Very good

I would rate the way we work as a consortium as

Unsatisfying	Fair	Good	Very good
UnsatisfyingCompany Overall Unsatisfying	FairCompany Overall Fair	GoodCompany Overall Good	Very goodCompany Overall Very good

I feel fully integrated in the consortium

Yes	No
YesItem #1 Yes	NoItem #1 No

I feel considered by the project leader

Yes	No
YesItem #1 Yes	NoItem #1 No

There is a clear sense of common involvement in the project

Yes	No
YesItem #1 Yes	NoItem #1 No

IMPLEMENTATION

I would rate the implementation of the project as

Unsatisfying	Fair	Good	Very good
UnsatisfyingCompany Overall Unsatisfying	FairCompany Overall Fair	GoodCompany Overall Good	Very goodCompany Overall Very good

I feel that the project is progressing well

Yes	No
YesItem #1 Yes	NoItem #1 No

I receive the suppot I need from the partners to execute my tasks

Yes	No
YesItem #1 Yes	NoItem #1 No

I realise the benefits that my institution will get from its participation in the project

Yes	No
YesItem #1 Yes	NoItem #1 No

I am committed to implement the project

Yes	No
YesItem #1 Yes	NoItem #1 No

The financial resources of the project are adequate to execute the tasks assigned

Yes	No
YesItem #1 Yes	NoItem #1 No

The participants from my institution are satisfied with the activities organised by the project

Yes	No
YesItem #1 Yes	NoItem #1 No

I particularly liked or disliked some aspects in the meeting:

For the next meetings, I would recommend improving the following aspects:

SURVEYS

SQUARE – management meeting on 7 July 2021 in Batumi, Georgia